Published on in Vol 14 (2025)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/66336, first published .
Innovative, Technology-Driven, Digital Tools for Managing Pediatric Urinary Incontinence: Scoping Review

Innovative, Technology-Driven, Digital Tools for Managing Pediatric Urinary Incontinence: Scoping Review

Innovative, Technology-Driven, Digital Tools for Managing Pediatric Urinary Incontinence: Scoping Review

Review

1Department of Research and Development, Minze Health NV, Antwerp, Belgium

2Department of Product Development, Faculty of Design Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium

3Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium

4Department of Urology, University Hospital Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium

5Antwerp Surgical Training, Anatomy and Research Centre (ASTARC), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium

Corresponding Author:

Lola Bladt, MSc

Department of Product Development

Faculty of Design Sciences

University of Antwerp

Paardenmarkt 90/94

Antwerp, 2000

Belgium

Phone: 32 497848014

Email: lola.bladt@uantwerpen.be


Background: Urinary incontinence affects approximately 7% to 10% of children during the day and 9% to 12% of children during the night. Treatment mainly involves lifestyle advice and behavioral methods, but motivation and adherence are low. Traditional tools such as pen-and-paper solutions may feel outdated and no longer meet the needs of today’s “digital native” children. Meanwhile, digital interventions have already shown effectiveness in other pediatric health care areas.

Objective: This scoping review aimed to identify and map innovative, technology-driven, digital tools for managing pediatric urinary incontinence.

Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched in March 2022 without date restrictions, complemented by cross-referencing. Studies were eligible if they focused on pediatric patients (aged ≤18 years) with bladder and bowel dysfunctions and explored noninvasive, technology-based interventions such as digital health, remote monitoring, and gamification. Studies on adults, invasive treatments, and conventional methods without tangible tools were excluded. Gray literature was considered, but non–English-language, inaccessible, or result-lacking articles were excluded. A formal critical appraisal was not conducted as the focus was on mapping existing tools rather than evaluating effectiveness. Data analysis combined descriptive statistics and qualitative content analysis, categorizing tools through iterative coding and team discussions.

Results: In total, 66 articles were included, with nearly one-third (21/66, 32%) focusing on nocturnal enuresis. Our analysis led to the identification of six main categories of tools: (1) digital self-management (7/66, 11%); (2) serious games (7/66, 11%); (3) reminder technology (6/66, 9%); (4) educational media (12/66, 18%), further divided into video (5/12, 42%) and other media (7/12, 58%); (5) telehealth and remote patient monitoring (13/66, 20%), with subcategories of communication (5/13, 38%) and technological advances (8/13, 62%); and (6) enuresis alarm innovations (21/66, 32%), further divided into novel configurations (8/21, 38%) and prevoid alarms (13/21, 62%).

Conclusions: The field of pediatric urinary incontinence demonstrates a considerable level of innovation, as evidenced by the inclusion of 66 studies. Many tools identified in this review were described as promising and feasible alternatives to traditional methods. These tools were reported to enhance engagement, improve compliance, and increase patient satisfaction and preference while also having the potential to save time for health care providers. However, this review also identified gaps in research, highlighting the need for more rigorous research to better assess the tools’ effectiveness and address the complex, multifaceted challenges of pediatric urinary incontinence management. Limitations of this review include restricting the search to 3 databases, excluding non–English-language articles, the broad scope, and single-reviewer screening, although frequent team discussions ensured rigor. We propose that future tools should integrate connected, adaptive, and personalized approaches that align with stakeholder needs, guided by a multidisciplinary, human-centered framework combining both qualitative and quantitative insights.

Interact J Med Res 2025;14:e66336

doi:10.2196/66336

Keywords



Background

Urinary incontinence (UI) is prevalent among children, affecting approximately 7% to 10% (aged 5-13 years) during the day [1] and 9% to 12% (aged 5-15 years) during the night [2-4]. UI often leads to low self-esteem, shame, and stress, negatively impacting the child’s psychosocial well-being and overall quality of life [5-9]. The primary treatment approach for pediatric UI, once anatomical and neurogenic causes are excluded, mainly involves lifestyle advice and behavioral methods [10-12]. These methods vary depending on whether the UI occurs during the day or at night.

For daytime UI (DUI), the recommended first-line approach is standard urotherapy. It encompasses patient education, keeping track of symptoms through bladder diaries, regulating fluid intake and toilet routines, adhering to scheduled voiding, and providing support and encouragement [13-16]. An important part of this treatment is teaching children appropriate responses to their bladder signals. Standard urotherapy achieves success rates ranging from 40% to 56% [17-19]. For nighttime UI, also known as nocturnal enuresis (NE), one of the recommended first-line treatments is NE alarm training [20]. This method uses a moisture sensor that triggers an alarm to wake the child upon bed-wetting. Through this approach, children are conditioned to recognize and respond to bladder signals, ultimately helping reduce bed-wetting episodes. The success rate of alarm training is between 50% and 70% [21]. However, motivation and adherence, both crucial for these behavioral methods to be successful [22,23], are low in practice [22,24,25].

There are many factors that influence motivation and adherence [15,24-27], including duration of therapy, required effort, symptom bother, and awareness but also the supporting tools’ usability and acceptance. The evaluation and management of pediatric UI traditionally rely on pen-and-paper bladder diaries [28-30], along with verbal and written instructions for behavioral techniques [16] and traditional NE alarms [31]. However, these analogue methods may seem outdated to today’s “digital native” children, who are accustomed to using technology and digital tools [32]. Consequently, traditional approaches to pediatric UI management may no longer meet today’s children’s needs and expectations, potentially affecting motivation and adherence. Meanwhile, digital interventions have already proven effective as alternatives to traditional methods in other pediatric health care areas such as pain tracking [33], attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder therapy [34], childhood obesity prevention [35], and asthma management [36].

Objectives

Therefore, our objective was to identify and map innovative, technology-driven, digital tools for pediatric UI management as alternatives to conventional approaches such as pen-and-paper solutions. In addition, we aimed to provide an overview of these tools’ characteristics, including their features, design drivers, and any reported evidence supporting their use.


This scoping review followed the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines as outlined by Tricco et al [37] (see Multimedia Appendix 1 for the PRISMA-ScR checklist).

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility criteria were determined based on the population, concept, and context framework. The population for this review included pediatric patients experiencing conditions such as bladder and bowel dysfunction (BBD), NE, overactive bladder (OAB), underactive bladder, and dysfunctional voiding (DV), as well as neurogenic conditions such as spina bifida. Studies involving adult populations (aged ≥18 years) or unrelated conditions (eg, cancer or rare diseases) were excluded.

The concept focused on innovative, technology-driven, digital tools for managing pediatric UI and related dysfunctions. Eligible tools included smartphone apps, multimedia resources, and remote monitoring technologies, whereas conventional methods or treatment plans without tangible tools were excluded.

The context was limited to studies that addressed noninvasive therapeutic approaches, particularly behavioral methods such as urotherapy, bladder training, and alarm training. Invasive approaches, including surgeries and their associated tools, were excluded.

All types of literature were considered, including gray literature (eg, conference proceedings, preprints, and technical reports), to provide a broad range of available literature and reduce publication bias. However, articles not presenting results or findings, not written in English, or lacking full-text availability were excluded.

Search Strategy

The search (see Multimedia Appendix 2 for the full search strategy) was conducted in March 2022 across 3 databases—PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library—with no limitations on publication dates. The population, concept, and context framework guided the selection of search terms.

Key search terms for population included “children,” “adolescents,” “pediatric,” “bladder bowel dysfunction,” and “enuresis.” For concept, terms such as “digital,” “mHealth,” “gamification,” “multimedia,” and “remote monitoring” were used. Context-related search terms included “urotherapy,” “bladder training,” “alarm therapy,” “self-monitoring,” and “behavior management.”

Study Selection

The study selection process was conducted by the first author (LB), with consultation and supervision provided by the team of authors. After removing duplicates, potential studies underwent screening based on their titles and abstracts in line with the eligibility criteria, with any uncertainties discussed with the author team.

Subsequently, LB read and assessed the full-text articles, periodically consulting with the team to ensure consistency and rigor. To reduce selection bias from database choice, we conducted cross-referencing, scanning the reference lists of the included articles to identify additional relevant studies.

The selected studies underwent final review and confirmation by the entire author team. A formal critical appraisal or methodological quality assessment was not conducted as the aim of this scoping review was to identify and map the available evidence on innovative, technology-driven, digital tools rather than draw formal conclusions on their effectiveness.

Data Extraction

Data were extracted and charted using Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corp) according to four main heading groups: (1) article information, (2) participant characteristics (population), (3) tool description (concept), and (4) research methods and results (context). Article information encompassed details such as article title, authors, journal, publication year, country, and database source. Participant characteristics included sample size, age range, sex distribution, and dysfunction indication. Tool description covered intended therapy type, tool design details, and its design drivers. Finally, research methods and results comprised study design, intervention groups, study outcomes, and conclusions.

Data Analysis

A combination of descriptive statistics and basic qualitative content analysis was used for data analysis. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze study characteristics, providing frequency counts and proportions for extraction items such as study design and dysfunction indication. Basic qualitative content analysis was used to identify and classify innovative, technology-driven, digital tools into distinct categories. The process began with multiple readings of the extraction items related to the tool description to familiarize ourselves with the data. Following an inductive approach, initial notes were made to generate codes, and coding was manually conducted in Microsoft Excel, where relevant terms were highlighted and grouped into emerging patterns. Through iterative refinement and team discussions, codes were merged, removed, or redefined to eliminate overlap and ensure sufficient distinction. The final set of codes was organized into 6 broad categories, 3 of which were further subdivided to capture more specific aspects. LB conducted the preliminary analysis, and to ensure consistency and reliability, the coding process was reviewed and refined collaboratively by the coauthors at multiple stages. Any disagreements on categorization were addressed through discussions to achieve consensus.


Retrieval of Studies

The search retrieved a total of 2030 articles (PubMed: n=951, 46.85%; Web of Science: n=760, 37.44%; Cochrane Library: n=319, 15.71%). After removing duplicates (372/2030, 18.33%), a total of 81.67% (1658/2030) of the studies were included in the title and abstract screening. Following title and abstract screening, of the 1658 articles, 1575 (94.99%) were excluded, leaving 83 (5.01%) for full-text evaluation. Finally, 60 articles were included in the data extraction process, with an additional 6 identified through cross-referencing, resulting in a total of 66 included articles. Figure 1 illustrates the flowchart of the screening and selection process.

Figure 1. PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) flowchart of the literature screening and selection process.

General Analysis to Describe the Study Characteristics

Of the included studies (n=66), most were randomized controlled trials (RCTs; 14/66, 21%) and validation studies (13/66, 20%), followed by quasi-experiments (10/66, 15%), prospective studies with no control group (7/66, 11%), and qualitative or mixed methods studies (8/66, 12%), as shown in Table 1. Nearly one-third (21/66, 32%) of the identified tools targeted children with NE, followed by DV (9/66, 14%), BBD (7/66, 11%), and DUI (7/66, 11%). More than one-third (25/66, 38%) of the studies evaluated outcomes related to patient experience, such as satisfaction, motivation, and usability. A mean sample size of 82 (SD 83; range 14-353) participants was found for the RCTs, quasi-experiments, and prospective studies (no control), indicating a large variation in sample size.

We identified and established a total of six primary categories of innovative, technology-driven, digital tools (Figure 2): (1) digital self-management (7/66, 11%), (2) serious games (7/66, 11%), (3) reminder technology (6/66, 9%), (4) educational media (12/66, 18%), (5) telehealth and remote patient monitoring (RPM; 13/66, 20%), and (6) enuresis alarm innovations (21/66, 32%). Further subcategories were identified within educational media, including video (5/12, 42%) and other media (7/12, 58%); within telehealth and RPM, including communication (5/13, 38%) and technological advances (8/13, 62%); and within enuresis alarm innovations, including novel configurations (8/21, 38%) and prevoid alarms (13/21, 62%).

Table 1. Summary of study characteristics (n=66).
Study characteristicStudies, n (%)
Study design

RCTa14 (21)

Feasibility or validation study13 (20)

Quasi-experiment10 (15)

Prospective ncb7 (11)

Review6 (9)

Mixed methods study5 (8)

Retrospective study4 (6)

Qualitative study3 (5)

Modeling2 (3)

Case study1 (2)

Design-based research1 (2)
Dysfunction indication

NEc21 (32)

DVd9 (14)

BBDe7 (11)

DUIf7 (11)

DUI or nighttime UIg5 (8)

Neurogenic5 (8)

UTIh4 (6)

Developmental or neurodevelopmental disorder3 (5)

OABi2 (3)

UABj1 (2)

Bowel dysfunction1 (2)

Anatomical1 (2)

aRCT: randomized controlled trial.

bnc: no control.

cNE: nocturnal enuresis.

dDV: dysfunctional voiding.

eBBD: bladder and bowel dysfunction.

fDUI: daytime urinary incontinence.

gUI: urinary incontinence.

hUTI: urinary tract infection.

iOAB: overactive bladder.

jUAB: underactive bladder.

Figure 2. Overview of the 6 categories and subcategories of innovative, technology-driven, digital tools. RPM: remote patient monitoring.

Overall, we found that the distribution of dysfunction types was generally well balanced across the different tool categories. Digital self-management exhibited a diverse distribution, addressing a range of dysfunctions including BBD (1/7, 14%), DUI or nighttime UI (1/7, 14%), and neurogenic disorders (2/7, 29%). Serious games were predominantly used for DV (5/7, 71%). Reminder technology was used for timed voiding in cases of DUI and OAB (3/6, 50%), as well as for self-management of neurogenic and developmental or neurodevelopmental disorders (3/6, 50%). Educational media was used across a range of dysfunctions, with slightly more use for NE (4/12, 33%) and urinary tract infections (UTIs; 3/12, 25%). Telehealth was primarily used for BBD (4/13, 31%) and DUI or nighttime UI (4/13, 31%), with additional use also observed for DV (3/13, 23%). Finally, enuresis alarm innovations were predominantly associated with NE (16/21, 76%), as expected, although not exclusively. They were also applied for other conditions, such as DUI (2/21, 10%) and developmental or neurodevelopmental disorders (2/21, 10%).

Categories of Innovative, Technology-Driven, Digital Tools

Digital Self-Management
Category Overview and Key Drivers

Digital devices such as smartphones, tablets, and computers have become increasingly prevalent in our society, especially among children and adolescents [38]. Therefore, they offer a practical and accessible medium with a range of health care possibilities, such as digital self-management to enhance patient engagement and improving access, availability, and continuity of care [38,39].

Tools Within This Category

This review identified 11% (7/66) of the studies on digital self-management, with extended details available in Table S1 in Multimedia Appendix 3 [40-105]. These included electronic bladder diary apps [40,41], which served as digital alternatives to traditional paper versions to improve patient compliance. In addition, 3 self-management applications with training programs were included, targeting conditions such as DUI (smartphone app) [42], bowel dysfunctions (internet application) [43], and spina bifida (smartphone app) [44,45]. These self-management applications incorporated features such as weekly modules with exercises; daily goals; self-monitoring of parameters such as fluid intake, toilet visits, medication, and mood status; reminders; progress tracking; personalized feedback; and rewards such as in-application trophies and stars. Furthermore, a parent software portal [46] was identified, enabling parents to monitor their children’s symptoms, such as UTIs, to aid clinical decision-making.

Study Results and Conclusions

The studies on digital self-management tools reported feasibility, acceptability, ease of use, and patient and parent satisfaction [40-46]. Furthermore, they described improvements in patient compliance, as observed in both the bowel dysfunction self-management program and the parent software portal, with high completion rates and low dropout [43,46]. However, the parent software portal was described as facing challenges in effectively delivering information to health care professionals, lacking integration into their busy clinical practice [46].

Despite many promising aspects, the studies often reported limitations in providing robust evidence of effectiveness. For example, the electronic bladder diary format was described as offering data quality advantages for certain patients but was not found to be superior to a paper-based bladder diary [40]. The sole RCT investigating a self-management program for bowel dysfunctions reported greater improvements in patients’ quality of life and reduction in overall symptom severity. However, this was in comparison to a nonequivalent control group of children on a waitlist who were not receiving any treatment [43].

Serious Games
Category Overview and Key Drivers

Serious games are interactive applications designed as games but intended for educational or therapeutic purposes. By blending elements of fun and seriousness, serious games offer a playful way for children to learn about complex topics such as bladder and bowel health. This approach can be particularly effective for engaging children, who have limited attention spans and may struggle with processing information. Moreover, the entertainment aspect of serious games is crucial for motivating and engaging children as they strive for success within the game [41,106,107].

Tools Within This Category

Table S2 in Multimedia Appendix 3 [40-105] shows that serious games were mainly used for pelvic floor biofeedback training through biogames (6/7, 86%) [47-52]. In these biogames, the game action was controlled by the appropriate muscular contractions and relaxations detected by pelvic floor electromyography (EMG) patches worn by the child. Various animated scenarios were available, such as golfing, flying spaceships, riding an elephant, playing basketball, and swimming with dolphins or fish. In addition, one serious game was found for standard urotherapy, which was played on a smartphone [53]. In this game, the child was rewarded for maintaining a daily bladder diary and voiding adequately during the 3-month training program, with additional rewards for staying dry.

Study Results and Conclusions

Overall, the studies described positive effects of biogames for pelvic floor biofeedback training on health outcomes, particularly for children with DV [47-50,52] and, in one study, for those with underactive bladder [51]. However, understanding the precise impact of adding a game to the therapy is challenging as the studies reported limitations such as retrospective designs [49], lack of control groups [47], and nonequivalent therapy comparisons [48,50,51].

Findings varied across the studies. One study reported similar results in half the time with biogames (mean of 3.6, SD 1.8 sessions) compared to without (mean of 7.6, SD 5.2 sessions) [49], whereas another study reported a relatively high number of treatment sessions with biogames (mean of 9.6, SD 1.3 sessions) [50]. In the sole RCT comparing equivalent therapies [52], no differences were observed in terms of clinical success, cooperation, and motivation between pelvic floor biofeedback training with and without biogames. Nevertheless, subjective observations suggested that using biogames effectively captured children’s attention and prevented boredom during the sessions, particularly among younger children [52].

Similarly, in the comparison of standard urotherapy with and without a serious game, no significant differences were reported in training results, quality of life, or motivation [53]. However, children expressed a clear preference for the game. They provided valuable suggestions for its improvement, such as introducing more dynamic gameplay with changing storylines and evolving game types, along with features such as regular updates on training progress and detailed information about their bladder problem.

Reminder Technology
Category Overview and Key Drivers

Reminder technology uses programmable timers to activate alarms aimed at assisting children in adhering to therapy or self-management schedules without requiring constant prompting from parents. This approach supports children’s independence as parental reminders may sometimes contribute to resistance, with children preferring autonomy in adhering to their schedules [108].

Tools Within This Category

A total of 9% (6/66) of the studies were categorized under reminder technology (Table S3 in Multimedia Appendix 3 [40-105]). Half (3/6, 50%) of these studies evaluated timer watches, which were used in standard urotherapy to assist with timed voiding [54-56]. The timer watch can be programmed to automatically alarm at specified intervals, such as every 2 hours, helping children maintain a consistent voiding schedule.

The other half (3/6, 50%) of the studies focused on self-management reminders for children with neurogenic or developmental or neurodevelopmental disorders [57-59]. A laptop calendar program reminded children with prospective memory disabilities to complete and log daily schedules, such as self-catheterization and medication, through visual and auditory modalities [59]. A smartwatch with a built-in fitness tracker displayed visual icons to prompt children with spina bifida to engage in various daily activities from self-care to playtime and rewarding timely completion with stars [58]. Finally, “Potty Monkey,” an interactive toy, prompted children with special needs to void at set times, providing reminders, modeling techniques, and positive reinforcement for time-based toilet training [57].

Study Results and Conclusions

Reminder technology for timed voiding using a timer watch was reported to be superior in treating severe DUI in children with OAB compared to standard urotherapy without it, with improved adherence to the voiding schedule playing a key factor [55,56]. In addition, another study described reminder technology as an equally effective but simpler alternative to enuresis alarms (using moisture sensors) in treating DUI, also reporting good adherence rates [54].

For self-management in children with neurogenic or developmental or neurodevelopmental disorders, reminder technology was reported to be feasible, although the findings were based on small sample sizes [57-59]. The tools were described as alleviating anxiety in caregivers and patients by providing a log of tasks [59] and fostering child independence through clear routines [58]. However, patient acceptance varied, with the smartwatch being highly accepted [58] and the interactive toy receiving lower acceptance [57], with aesthetics and flexibility playing a key role.

Educational Media
Video
Category Overview and Key Drivers

Videos, as educational media, offer a visually engaging and interactive format for explaining complex concepts and techniques to patients and parents. They provide a convenient and 24/7-available alternative or supplement to in-person visits. Moreover, videos offer anonymity, which can be beneficial for individuals who feel embarrassed or hesitant to seek medical advice in person. As a result, the internet and video-sharing platforms have become popular sources of health-related information [32].

Tools Within This Category

In our review, 8% (5/66) of the studies were classified under the subcategory of video within educational media (Table S4 in Multimedia Appendix 3 [40-105]). These videos covered a range of topics. Some supported behavioral therapy, such as an animated bladder training video [60,61] and an abundance of YouTube videos on NE therapy [62,63]. Another video focused on preparing children for surgical interventions, featuring actual hospital staff and using role-play modeling techniques to demonstrate the anesthesia process [64].

Study Results and Conclusions

Multiple studies within this subcategory (3/5, 60%) described videos as effective educational media for patients offering alternatives to in-person strategies [60,61,64]. In a noninferiority RCT, the animated bladder training video was found to be equivalent to standard urotherapy in reducing bladder and bowel symptoms [60] and improving quality of life scores [61]. Similarly, the presurgery video was reported to effectively reduce preoperative anxiety and resulted in less postoperative maladaptive behavior [64].

While videos were described as effective tools for educating patients and families, caution is recommended when relying on video-sharing platforms such as YouTube that lack robust systems to ensure the accuracy, completeness, and quality of the information [62,63]. The studies indicated a need for a balance between adherence to evidence-based guidelines and the creation of engaging content that captures and maintains viewer attention.

Other Media
Category Overview and Key Drivers

Effective information delivery is crucial for raising awareness, setting expectations, promoting patient adherence, and ensuring data quality. Unfortunately, verbal explanations by physicians may be poorly understood due to time constraints and complexity, whereas written information may not always be suitable or desirable for children, resulting in limited child participation. Thus, using other types of educational media tailored and engaging for children may help ensure effective information delivery to pediatric patients.

Tools Within This Category

A total of 11% (7/66) of the studies were classified under other types of educational media (Table S5 in Multimedia Appendix 3 [40-105]). This category included 2 homework books for UI: one that used coloring activities to log the severity of incontinence [65] and another that featured practical exercises for standard urotherapy [66]. In addition, a multimedia program for NE was identified, which combined text, drawings, cartoons, and sound to educate children on bed-wetting [67,68]. Finally, educational materials on UTIs included educational urine kits for clean-catch urine collection [69-71] and a low-cost origami-based microscope that used a mobile phone camera to raise awareness of genital hygiene and UTIs in schools [71].

Study Results and Conclusions

The UI homework books were reported to be feasible, usable, and well received, with good compliance [65,66]. In addition, the homework book for standard urotherapy was associated with increased fluid intake and hold time [66].

The multimedia program for NE was noted to show promise in holding children’s attention and improving their knowledge, especially for younger children with low literacy levels [67]. However, results from the RCT indicated that, while the multimedia program was not more effective than traditional verbal and written information, it could help save health care professionals time in patient education [68].

Similarly, urine kits with educational pamphlets for clean-catch urine collection did not result in a significant reduction in contamination rates but may help streamline patient education [69,70]. In addition, the origami-based microscope was described as a promising educational tool for promoting health awareness by detecting UTI-positive urine samples reasonably well [71].

Telehealth and RPM
Communication
Category Overview and Key Drivers

Telehealth and RPM enable remote communication and data exchange between patients and clinicians. Although face-to-face communication has been shown to improve treatment adherence [27,109,110], constraints such as time, cost, and travel can lead to extended intervals between consultations, potentially affecting patient motivation [111]. Telehealth may address some of these issues by offering consistent follow-up visits and motivational support without the need for physical visits.

Tools Within This Category

A total of 8% (5/66) of the studies were classified within the subcategory of communication using telehealth and RPM (Table S6 in Multimedia Appendix 3 [40-105]). One study explored videoconferencing for remote patient visits [72], whereas another study evaluated a UTI home monitoring system [73]. This system facilitated communication between parents of children with neurogenic bladder and urology nursing staff to alert them of potential UTI signs. It comprised a portable urinalysis device, Bluetooth weight scale, thermometer, electronic bladder diary, and mobile communication device. In addition, an embodied conversational agent, “Dr. Evie,” was identified, offering personalized lifestyle advice and empathetic coaching for UI self-management while generating reports for general practitioners [74-76].

Study Results and Conclusions

The studies reported high patient and parent satisfaction with telehealth, citing reduced stress and increased convenience, especially for rural families, due to decreased travel time [72-76]. In addition, the UI self-management program featuring an embodied conversational agent was reported to improve patient adherence rates from 50% to 76% on average and alleviate symptoms [74-76]. Advice from nonfamily members and a sense of alliance with Dr Evie were noted to enhance program engagement.

Health care providers expressed mixed feelings about telehealth, acknowledging improved access to care but reporting technical barriers in conducting physical examinations and establishing rapport, particularly with pediatric patients [72]. Integrating RPM systems such as the UTI monitoring system may mitigate these technical barriers by providing valuable data for remote support and enhancing patient and parent self-efficacy [73]. However, patients’ selective use of certain products, mainly the urinalysis device, was noted to create data gaps that hinder clinical evaluation. In addition, technical issues contributed to increased workload for clinical teams, emphasizing the importance of careful consideration of all stakeholders’ diverse needs and preferences to facilitate successful integration into clinical practice.

Technological Advances
Category Overview and Key Drivers

Technological advances enabling telehealth and RPM aim to overcome limitations of in-clinic procedures, including the psychological stress that children often experience in hospital settings [77,112]. These procedures can also be inconvenient and time-consuming, as seen with noninvasive uroflowmetry, which requires voiding with a full bladder [78]. Similarly, therapies such as EMG biofeedback demand significant time and financial resources due to poor compliance and the need for multiple visits [77]. Meanwhile, invasive studies carry health risks and are often discouraged, especially for young patients [113,114].

Tools Within This Category

In total, 12% (8/66) of the studies were classified in the telehealth and RPM subcategory that focused on technological advances (Table S7 in Multimedia Appendix 3 [40-105]). These ranged from a machine learning algorithm to predict enuresis in children [79] to a noninvasive alternative to traditional invasive urodynamics using near-infrared spectrometry [80].

Advances in uroflowmetry beyond traditional gravimetric methods for home use were also reviewed [78]. These included basic volumetric, mechanical, and electrical methods such as capacitance sensors. Unconventional approaches were also discussed, including image processing for drop patterns, ultrasound Doppler effect, vibration sensors on the penis, and acoustic technology using a smartphone app to record urine sound [78,81].

Several studies (5/8, 63%) explored adapting existing technologies for home use. This included gravimetric uroflowmetry for home use [77,81] and its application in therapy settings to provide biofeedback during voiding [77,82]. Another study introduced home pelvic floor biofeedback through a wearable EMG device featuring a watchlike design with a light scale to indicate muscle activity strength [83]. In addition, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation was evaluated as a user-friendly substitute for in-clinic percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation to enhance continence, enabling self-administration at home without invasive needle insertion [84].

Study Results and Conclusions

Overall, the studies described promising advances in technology. The machine learning technology was described as having promising accuracy in screening for enuresis, with older age at toilet training initiation identified as a significant predictor [79]. Both uroflowmetry and EMG biofeedback were described as effective in reducing symptoms in patients with DV [82,83], with home uroflowmetry biofeedback showing promise and patient preference [77]. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation was reported to show efficacy in reducing NE episodes, providing a safe and noninvasive at-home treatment option [84].

However, some novel technologies such as near-infrared spectrometry were described as promising and well accepted by patients but were also noted to lack standardized benchmarks and face challenges in ensuring consistent and reliable data that align with established norms and guidelines [80]. Similarly, while various uroflowmetry methods exist, gravimetric uroflowmeters were favored due to their simplicity and reliability [78]. For example, sound-based uroflowmetry, despite showing strong correlations with conventional uroflowmetry, was reported to have wide limits of agreement, with its accuracy influenced by variables such as smartphone type and toilet settings [81].

Enuresis Alarm Innovations
Novel Configurations
Category Overview and Key Drivers

Enuresis alarms function by detecting urine on 2 conducting strips, causing a voltage change and triggering an alarm [85-87]. Alarms with rigid wires may cause discomfort or psychological effects for the child, whereas fragile sensors can lead to missed alarms due to unintentional or deliberate deactivation. Conversely, overly sensitive alarms may trigger false alarms, which can be discouraging for patients [86]. These design shortcomings related to comfort, durability, and reliability in traditional enuresis alarms are the reason for novel configurations.

Tools Within This Category

We encountered 12% (8/66) of the studies featuring various configurations of enuresis alarms (Table S8 in Multimedia Appendix 3 [40-105]), spanning pad-and-bell to body-worn alarms and wired to wireless alarms. The pad-and-bell alarm used a bed mat with conductive strips, whereas the body-worn alarm had a sensor attached to underwear [86-88]. Wireless versions transmitted signals to an alarm positioned further away, requiring the child to leave the bed to deactivate it [86]. Smart textile sensors integrated conductive threads into underwear or disposable urine pads [85], with recent innovations incorporating wireless transmitters and smartphone apps for notifications and reinforcement strategies [89].

Configurations of the alarm signal itself ranged from loud acoustic alarms to subtler options such as lights, vibrating alarms, or personalized recorded messages [86]. For instance, one study evaluated a code word alarm with a digital voice recorder for parents to record personalized code words, rewarding children for recalling them the following morning [90]. Finally, another, more unconventional approach involved electrical impulses via surface electrode pads to activate the external urethral sphincter to interrupt micturition instead of relying on audible alarms [91,92].

Study Results and Conclusions

Comparative studies on pad-and-bell versus body-worn alarms reported mixed results [87,88]. While one study reported better outcomes with the pad-and-bell alarm [88], another found both equally effective but noted high dropout rates due to embarrassment [87]. Variations in false alarm rates and missed alarms were observed, suggesting that individual device features may have influenced performance more than the alarm type itself.

A review [86] highlighted the potential of smart textiles to enhance comfort and detection efficiency, with studies reporting positive performance and safety during daytime training [85,89]. One of these studies specifically found that a smart textile alarm with an app delivered similar outcomes in less time with high patient and parent satisfaction compared to standard behavioral therapy for toilet training children with autism spectrum disorder [89].

Using a prerecorded code word was reported to improve arousal response and training attitude, reducing dropout by 10%, although it only affected treatment outcomes in a subgroup with monosymptomatic NE [90]. Electrical impulses were reported as effective with perineal placement [91], though based on a small sample, whereas suprapubic placement showed no significant effect [92]. Reported benefits included potentially reducing fully wet beds, boosting self-confidence, and family motivation, but drawbacks such as higher cost, complexity, and potential fear of electrical currents were also noted.

Prevoid Alarms
Category Overview and Key Drivers

Traditional enuresis alarms provide a warning after an enuretic incident has occurred. Consequently, both the child and the parent still experience the inconvenience and consequences of wet pants or sheets during treatment, requiring a substantial level of motivation [93,94] Moreover, the child must establish an indirect link between the full bladder sensation and the alarm as it sounds after the bladder has emptied. These limitations have driven the development of prevoid enuresis alarms, designed to anticipate enuretic incidents by predicting when they might occur and provide a warning in advance.

Tools Within This Category

A total of 20% (13/66) of the studies were found on prevoid alarms (Table S9 in Multimedia Appendix 3 [40-105]), of which most (12/13, 92%) used ultrasound technology to trigger an alarm when bladder volume reached a predefined threshold. Basic ultrasound technology detected the posterior bladder wall rising above the symphysis pubis [93,95], whereas advanced systems estimated bladder volume using an array of transducers to locate both the anterior and posterior bladder walls through ultrasound echoes [94,96-104].

Various specialized measures were implemented to enhance the reliability of prevoid alarms. This included using intelligent software and machine learning to customize for factors such as body morphology, age, and sex [95,98-104]. Furthermore, to mitigate sensitivity to ultrasound probe movement, solutions such as tailored belts [93,95,104], elastic garments [94,98-100], adhesive materials [101-103], and even synchronizing measurements with the child’s respiratory rhythm [95] were explored.

One prevoid alarm system estimated bladder volume using wearables and deep learning instead of ultrasound. It tracked impedance using a waist belt sensor, heart rate and sleep stage using a smartwatch, and limb movement using fabric foot bands [105].

Study Results and Conclusions

The studies on prevoid enuresis alarms were primarily validation and feasibility studies reporting on the technological feasibility of these alarms, with detection rates varying from <50% to 90% [93,95-98,102,104,105]. However, sample sizes were small (1 to 41 patients) or relied on artificial bladder models.

Patient acceptance, influenced by the need for a comfortable, discrete, and nonstigmatizing design, was evaluated for MyPad [99,100] and SENS-U [101,103], both of which were well accepted. SENS-U was also reported to be feasible for both daytime bladder training [101] and nighttime monitoring [103].

Despite feasibility, several challenges were noted, including sensor positioning sensitivity; bladder shape changes due to an enlarged rectum or posture; and compatibility issues with different body types, particularly in children with obesity [93,94,98,100-104]. In addition, daytime observations of SENS-U showed that 23% of children experienced urgency or leakage before reaching the predefined volume-based threshold [101].

Finally, only 8% (1/13) of these studies compared the prevoid alarm with the traditional alarm, reporting comparable cure rates but a treatment duration approximately 3 times longer with the prevoid alarm [94]. The study suggested that awakening to wet sheets may constitute a classic conditioning negative reinforcement potentially essential for the cure process.


Principal Findings

In this scoping review, we identified and mapped innovative, technology-driven, digital tools for managing pediatric UI. The field of pediatric UI demonstrates a considerable level of innovation, as evidenced by the inclusion of 66 articles, with nearly one-third (21/66, 32%) focusing on NE. Our analysis led to the identification of six primary categories of tools, 3 of which were divided into subcategories. (1) Digital self-management tools, which leveraged the widespread use of smartphones, tablets, and computers, offering a convenient and accessible medium for health-related purposes such as electronic bladder diaries [40,41] and self-management apps or portals [42-46]. (2) Serious games, which engaged children through playful interactions, such as games for pelvic floor biofeedback training [47-52] and standard urotherapy [53]. (3) Reminder technology, which aimed to enhance therapy adherence without constant parental prompting, such as timer watches [54-56] and self-management reminder tools [57-59]. (4) Educational media for delivering health-related information to patients, which was subdivided into videos and other types of educational media. Videos offered visually engaging, 24/7-accessible, and anonymous dissemination of health information on topics ranging from behavioral therapy, such as bladder training and NE therapy [60-63], to preparing for surgical interventions [64]. A variety of other materials were found that provided child-friendly and engaging patient education, such as UI homework books [65,66], an NE multimedia program [67,68], and educational materials for UTIs [69-71]. (5) Telehealth and RPM for remote health information exchange, which was subdivided into communication and technological advances. Remote communication between patients and health care professionals through videoconferencing [72], home monitoring systems [73], and an embodied conversational agent [74-76] can lead to time, cost, and travel savings. Technological advances such as machine learning algorithms [79], new technologies [78,80,81], and new applications enabling home use [77,78,80-84] aimed to overcome the limitations of in-clinic procedures. (6) Enuresis alarm innovations, which were subdivided into novel configurations of traditional enuresis alarms and prevoid alarms. Enuresis alarm configurations encompassed pad-and-bell and body-worn alarms [86-88], wired and wireless systems [86], smart textiles [85,89], and a variety of alarm signals [86,90-92]. Prevoid alarms aimed to predict enuretic incidents and provide warnings in advance [93-105], with most using bladder ultrasound technology [93-104].

Many of the tools identified in this review were described as promising alternatives to traditional methods, with studies reporting their feasibility [40-46,57-59,65,66,93,95-98, 102,104,105], potential to improve outcomes [43,47-53,60, 61,64,74-76,82-84,90], and ability to save time for health care providers [49,60,61,64,68-70]. In addition, these tools were described as engaging for children, improving patient compliance [43,46,52,54-56,66,67,74-76] and leading to high levels of patient satisfaction and preference [40-46,53,58,72-77, 89,100,101,103].

However, the current body of evidence has methodological limitations, including retrospective designs [49,55,82,83]; absence of control groups [47,57,75,76,84,94,101,103]; and small sample sizes, with almost one-quarter of the studies (16/66, 24%) having a sample size of ≤15 participants [45,58,59,73,75,83,85,91,96,98-101,103-105]. While 21% (14/66) of the included studies were RCTs [43,50-52,56,60, 61,64,68,77,88-90,92], some of these (3/14, 21%) did not compare equivalent therapies [43,50,51]. Furthermore, the findings varied, with some studies (10/66, 15%) demonstrating differences in outcomes between the novel tools and traditional methods [49,55,56,74-76,88-90,94], whereas others (9/66, 14%) reported similar outcomes [40,50,60,68-70,77,87,92]. These observations highlight the need for more rigorous research to better establish the effectiveness of these tools.

Understanding the Challenges of Managing Pediatric UI

The variability in the reported findings and gaps in robust evidence may also reflect the complexity of managing pediatric UI. This review highlights the multifaceted and multifactorial influences on pediatric UI management.

Multifaceted Influences

Pediatric UI management encompasses various aspects, such as patient education, diagnosis-informed behavior modifications, and providing support and encouragement (Figure 3).

Figure 3. Pediatric urinary incontinence management is multifaceted, including patient education, diagnosis-informed behavior modifications, and support and encouragement. Integrating these aspects into a connected ecosystem might be an ideal way to address this multifaceted nature.

Regarding patient education, the studies included in this review highlighted various educational activities, such as raising awareness [69-71], explaining complex concepts [64], setting expectations [67,68], providing lifestyle advice [60-63,75,76], and promoting adherence [53,65,66,74].

Regarding diagnosis-informed behavior modifications, management typically began with a thorough diagnostic process, as described in several included studies (9/66, 14%) [40,65,72,74-76,78,80,81]. By accurately identifying contributing factors and underlying causes, appropriate therapeutic interventions can be selected. The interventions described in the reviewed studies included providing instructions and reminders to establish healthy bladder and bowel habits [54-59]. Monitoring these habits through the collection of data on fluid intake, voiding patterns, and bowel movements [40,41,53], as well as quality of life indicators [42-45], was reported to help identify patterns and track progress over time [42-46,53,73].

Regarding support and encouragement, the included studies emphasized that support, encouragement, and feedback can help reinforce positive behaviors and maintain therapy consistency whether in the clinic [47-52], at home [42-45,72,74-77,84], or in a group setting [82].

Despite this multifaceted nature, many tools discussed in this review offered stand-alone solutions that addressed specific aspects. Examples include mobile health apps for keeping electronic bladder diaries [40,41], biogames for pelvic floor biofeedback [47-52], timer watches for timed voiding [54-56], educational videos covering specific concepts [60-64], and enuresis alarm innovations for alarm training [85-104]. While these stand-alone solutions addressed particular aspects of pediatric UI management, they did so in isolation, potentially missing opportunities to create synergies and links between different aspects of UI management. This review leads us to wonder whether integrating these various aspects into a connected ecosystem could better address the multifaceted nature of UI management.

Multifactorial Influences

Pediatric UI management is influenced by a range of factors, such as clinical signs, child characteristics, and the involvement of multiple stakeholders (Figure 4).

Regarding clinical signs, the management of pediatric UI depends on the specific type and severity of symptoms that children experience. These can include multiple symptoms related to the bladder and bowel [40,60,61,72,78,80,81] occurring during the day or night [41,74-76,79]. Therefore, each child’s therapy journey is unique, with varying underlying causes, progress rates, and potential setbacks. Accurate differentiation during the diagnostic phase, along with continuous monitoring of therapy progress, as described in some studies (11/66, 17%) [42-45,53,74-77,82,83], can support tailoring management plans to the child’s specific condition and adapting them as needed. We propose that tools be adaptive to meet the evolving needs of children during therapy and help maintain their motivation. For instance, feedback from children using the urotherapy serious game indicated a desire for more dynamic gameplay that adapts to their training progress [53].

Figure 4. Pediatric urinary incontinence management is multifactorial, influenced by a range of factors such as (1) clinical signs that progress over time, requiring adaptive interventions; (2) child characteristics that demand a personalized approach; and (3) the involvement of multiple stakeholders whose needs must be aligned.

Regarding child characteristics, the management of UI depends not only on the child’s clinical signs and physiological needs but also on their psychological and emotional needs. As described in the studies, these needs can influence the child’s motivation [52,53,93,94,106], attitude toward training [43,46,55,56,65,66,74,90], and level of maturation and attention span [52,67]. Emotional factors such as self-image, embarrassment, fear, and stress were also described as key influences [59,64,87,91]. These child-specific characteristics can influence outcomes. For instance, varying findings of comparative studies on different enuresis alarm configurations [87,88] suggested that certain configurations may be more effective for some children than for others. In addition, one study reported that reminder technology was an equally effective but simpler alternative to enuresis alarms in treating DUI [54]. We propose that personalizing or selecting tools based on the child’s preferences may enhance acceptance and satisfaction and potentially lead to better outcomes.

Regarding multiple stakeholders, each stakeholder involved in pediatric UI management has distinct needs. The studies indicated that parental motivation often depended on constraints such as time, cost, and travel, prioritizing convenience and self-efficacy [22,25,40,41,46,72-76,78,89,91,93,94]. Health care professionals, on the other hand, were described as managing time constraints in busy clinical practices, aiming for efficiency and high-quality data [40,46,49,60,61,64,78,80] while also maintaining empathy and establishing a therapeutic alliance [72,75]. Aligning these diverse needs can be challenging, as described for the UTI remote monitoring system [73]. Although the system comprised a set of products, most parents primarily used the urinalysis device because it met their needs for self-efficacy and reassurance. The other products were underused, leading to frustration among health care providers, who faced added workload for setting up the system without improved data quality. These findings underscore the importance of designing tools that balance the needs of all stakeholders, improving quality of life for patients and families while optimizing time and efficiency for health care professionals.

Transforming Health Care With Connected Ecosystems

Given the multifaceted and multifactorial nature of pediatric UI management, we propose that novel tools should be designed as health care ecosystems that are (1) connected, (2) adaptive, (3) personalized, and (4) aligned with the needs of all stakeholders.

The concept of health care ecosystems for managing pediatric UI is rooted in a broader transformation of the health care industry driven by innovation [115]. Advances such as electronic health records, networked computer systems, and telehealth have revolutionized health care delivery, shifting from a model centered on face-to-face interactions with individual clinicians to a smart, interconnected health care community emphasizing shared decision-making [116]. The COVID-19 pandemic further accelerated this transition, highlighting the critical role of digital technologies in maintaining access to health care [117]. Furthermore, recent breakthroughs in computational power and artificial intelligence promise to expand the capabilities of health care systems even further [116].

A fair part of the currently available medical devices already has the ability to connect and communicate with other devices or systems. This connectivity transforms previously isolated tools into collaborative systems that operate within closed feedback loops, tailoring outputs to the individual [118]. For example, in glucose monitoring, sensors measure blood glucose levels, which then inform insulin delivery systems to maintain optimal glucose control [119]. Similarly, smart pillboxes improve medication adherence by tracking remaining doses, providing reminders through a connected alarm device [120].

While many of these systems have been tested primarily in contexts such as monitoring older patients at home [121]—where they support independence and reduce health care burdens—pediatric urology presents a significant opportunity for similar innovations. For example, a recently published article on the Minze Homeflow system demonstrates how a connected ecosystem can enhance pediatric UI management [122]. It integrates physical products (uroflowmeter and accessories) with digital tools (Minze app and clinician portal) for remote monitoring of uroflowmetry and bladder diary data. By shifting diagnostics to the home environment, the Homeflow system minimizes stress for pediatric patients while providing more reliable data compared to in-clinic measurements. Such a system demonstrates the feasibility and benefits of connected health care ecosystems in addressing specific challenges in pediatric urology.

Another study demonstrated how the Homeflow ecosystem could be further expanded by connecting additional products to the system, such as a smart drinking bottle and reminder technology, to personalize urotherapy [123]. The smart drinking bottle and home uroflowmeter monitored fluid intake and urinary output, whereas a reminder watch linked these devices, offering personalized voiding prompts based on the child’s bladder capacity and fluid intake. This demonstrates the potential of connected ecosystems to adapt and align with the individual care needs of pediatric patients.

Overcoming Challenges in Health Care Innovation

The successful implementation of health care innovation and ecosystems requires addressing important challenges, such as regulatory and privacy concerns, equitable access, screen time considerations, and keeping health care human centered. Thoughtful strategies are needed to overcome these challenges and maximize benefits.

Regulatory and Privacy Concerns

Ensuring patient privacy and data security remains a critical challenge for digital health care innovation [124]. As these tools handle sensitive patient data, robust regulatory frameworks must be established to protect patient data. However, balancing innovation with regulation remains a challenge, especially considering the rapid pace of technological advancements. Current regulations may struggle to keep up, potentially delaying the adoption of transformative tools. A balanced approach is required to ensure safety and trust without hampering innovation that can improve patient care.

Equity in Access

Ensuring equitable access is another challenge for health care innovation, especially in low-resource settings. Individuals in such settings must not be left behind as they are often the ones who stand to benefit the most from these advancements [115]. However, barriers such as limited infrastructure, potentially high entry costs, and digital literacy disparities can hinder adoption [116]. Nevertheless, innovation also has the potential to improve equity by decentralizing care. Shifting diagnostics and therapies from clinics to homes or communities can reduce costs and improve accessibility. In addition, customizable solutions tailored to varying resource levels, aligned with reimbursement models, or supported through public health initiatives can support the equitable implementation of innovation.

Screen Time Considerations

The use of digital tools raises concerns about screen time and its potential impact on children’s health. A 2019 systematic review [125] identified associations between excessive screen time and health risks, including adiposity, unhealthy diet, depressive symptoms, and reduced quality of life. However, the review did not consider the influence of content or context on these outcomes. Research indicates that well-designed, age-appropriate content, especially when curated by engaged adults [126], can positively impact learning and behavior [127]. For example, screen time can calm distressed children during medical procedures [128] or support language learning [129]. Moreover, active video games or nature exploration apps can encourage physical activity and imaginative play by connecting on- and off-screen experiences [130].

Nevertheless, certain screen use patterns present clear risks. Screen time before bedtime is strongly associated with sleep disturbances [131]. The mere presence of electronic devices in bedrooms has been linked to shorter sleep duration, partly due to melatonin suppression [132]—an essential consideration for tools addressing NE. A 2024 systematic review [133] reinforced these findings, showing that greater use of mobile devices, particularly at bedtime or in patterns of device dependence, can harm mental health in children and adolescents. At the same time, it emphasized technology’s dual impact—while social media often correlates with negative effects, other communication tools can enhance psychological well-being by strengthening social connections and providing access to support. These effects vary across individuals, highlighting the need to identify those most vulnerable to adverse effects.

In summary, the impact of screen time is shaped by multiple factors. To maximize benefits, digital tools should be thoughtfully designed to deliver engaging, age-appropriate content; promote balanced screen habits; integrate on- and off-screen interactions; and avoid bedtime use and overreliance on devices.

Keeping Health Care Human Centered

Digital technology presents significant opportunities to enhance efficiency and accuracy in health care. However, human interaction remains fundamental to preserving empathy, trust, and nuanced clinical decision-making. For example, a study in this review reported that health care providers experienced difficulties building rapport with pediatric patients due to technical barriers [72]. This underscores the importance of designing tools that augment health care professionals’ capabilities, ensuring that technology supports rather than depersonalizes patient care. Therefore, a human-centered approach to technology is needed to actively incorporate the perspectives and needs of patients, caregivers, and health care providers, placing them at the center of smart and connected health care in both research and practice [116].

Such an approach values not only objective evidence but also subjective patient and stakeholder experiences, combining quantitative and qualitative methods. However, in our review, only 12% (8/66) of the studies used qualitative [42,72,99] or mixed methods [40,44,58,67,73] designs. Despite this, more than one-third (25/66, 38%) of studies evaluated outcomes related to patient experience, such as satisfaction, motivation, and usability [42-45,52,53,57,58,66,67,71-73,75,76,82,88-90, 94,98-101,103]. This indicates a growing recognition of the importance of patient-centered outcomes but also underscores the need for more qualitative approaches to capture deeper insights.

To incorporate a human-centered approach, we conducted a separate qualitative study alongside this scoping review to explore children’s perspectives, experiences, and expectations regarding urotherapy-supporting tools. To facilitate this, we developed a focus group discussion toolkit specifically tailored to pediatric UI [134]. The toolkit incorporated creative tasks involving imagination and play, enabling children to express their thoughts and experiences in a child-friendly and engaging manner. By combining insights from this scoping review with the findings of the focus groups, we aimed to provide a comprehensive perspective that blends existing evidence with the desires and needs of the target population. This integrated approach can guide the development of more effective and user-centered tools for pediatric UI management.

Limitations

This scoping review has certain methodological limitations that should be considered when interpreting its results. First, the search was limited to 3 electronic databases, and only English-language papers were included. Second, only 1 reviewer screened the entire set of search results. However, the team engaged in frequent and extensive discussions throughout the study selection process to ensure rigorous screening. Third, our search had an extensive scope due to our broad criteria for defining innovative, technology-driven, digital tools, as well as having no time limits. The broad field and the potential abundance of relevant tools made it challenging to provide a concise overview of all the information. Consequently, this review encompassed a broad range of studies and a wide variety of innovative, technology-driven, digital tools.

Conclusions

This scoping review offers valuable insights into various categories of innovative, technology-driven, digital tools for managing pediatric UI and their supporting evidence. The inclusion of 66 articles highlights a considerable level of innovation in the field.

We identified 6 main categories of tools: digital self-management, serious games, reminder technology, educational media, telehealth and RPM, and enuresis alarm innovations. Further subcategories were found within these main categories, such as video and other media within educational media, communication and technological advances within telehealth and RPM, and novel configurations and prevoid alarms within enuresis alarm innovations.

Many of these tools were described as promising alternatives to traditional methods, with studies reporting feasibility, effectiveness in improving outcomes, and potential time savings for health care providers. In addition, these tools were described as engaging children effectively, potentially enhancing patient compliance and contributing to high patient satisfaction and preference. However, this review identified gaps in research, highlighting the need for more rigorous research to better assess the effectiveness of these tools and address the complex, multifaceted challenges of pediatric UI management. We propose the development of connected, adaptive, and personalized health care ecosystems that integrate diverse strategies for UI management, including education, diagnosis, therapy, monitoring, and feedback. By enabling synergies and links between these different strategies, such ecosystems could create a closed-loop system that enhances the alignment and efficiency of care.

We suggest that future research and development in this field adopt a human-centered and multidisciplinary approach, combining quantitative and qualitative methods to incorporate user perspectives and involve all stakeholders from the start. This mixed methods approach may help ensure that both objective evidence and subjective experiences are equally valued, supporting impactful innovations in the complex field of pediatric UI management.

Acknowledgments

The generative artificial intelligence tool ChatGPT by OpenAI was used to improve language and readability. The tool provided inspiration on how to rephrase parts of the manuscript, but final edits and decisions were made by the authors. This research is part of a PhD project partially funded by the Flanders Innovation and Entrepreneurship Baekeland grant (project ID HBC.2021.0836) and the company Minze Health.

Data Availability

The datasets generated or analyzed during this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors' Contributions

The conceptualization of this scoping review, including the formulation of the research question, search strategy, and eligibility criteria, was a collaborative effort involving the entire team of authors. LB took the lead in the study selection process and data analysis, which included screening titles and abstracts, assessing full-text articles, charting the data, and conducting categorization of the identified tools. Throughout these processes, LB consulted with the team to ensure consistency, rigor, and consensus. GDW and AV provided expertise on pediatric urinary incontinence management, whereas LVC and JV contributed insights on product design and categorization of the tools. All authors offered guidance throughout the research project, including interpretation and critical review. LB drafted the manuscript and finalized the version presented. The final manuscript was critically reviewed and approved by all authors.

Conflicts of Interest

None declared.

Multimedia Appendix 1

PRISMA-ScR checklist.

DOCX File , 108 KB

Multimedia Appendix 2

Full search strategy.

DOCX File , 14 KB

Multimedia Appendix 3

Overview of the included studies by tool category.

DOCX File , 1060 KB

  1. Nieuwhof-Leppink AJ, Schroeder RP, van de Putte EM, de Jong TP, Schappin R. Daytime urinary incontinence in children and adolescents. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. Jul 2019;3(7):492-501. [CrossRef]
  2. Spee-van der Wekke J, Hirasing RA, Meulmeester JF, Radder JJ. Childhood nocturnal enuresis in The Netherlands. Urology. Jun 1998;51(6):1022-1026. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  3. Marugán de Miguelsanz JM, Lapeña López de Armentia S, Rodríguez Fernández LM, Palau Benavides MT, Torres Hinojal MC, Menau Martín G, et al. [An epidemiological analysis of the sequence of bladder control and nocturnal enuresis prevalence in the children of the province of León]. An Esp Pediatr. Jun 1996;44(6):561-567. [Medline]
  4. Lottmann HB. [Treatment of nocturnal enuresis in France]. Presse Med. May 20, 2000;29(18):987-990. [Medline]
  5. Thibodeau BA, Metcalfe P, Koop P, Moore K. Urinary incontinence and quality of life in children. J Pediatr Urol. Feb 2013;9(1):78-83. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  6. Bower W. Self-reported effect of childhood incontinence on quality of life. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2008;35(6):617-621. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  7. Butler RJ. Annotation: night wetting in children: psychological aspects. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. Oct 09, 2003;39(4):453-463. [CrossRef]
  8. Morison MJ, Tappin D, Staines H. 'You feel helpless, that's exactly it': parents' and young people's control beliefs about bed-wetting and the implications for practice. J Adv Nurs. May 25, 2000;31(5):1216-1227. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  9. Deshpande AV, Craig JC, Smith GH, Caldwell PH. Factors influencing quality of life in children with urinary incontinence. J Urol. Sep 2011;186(3):1048-1052. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  10. Austin PF, Bauer SB, Bower W, Chase J, Franco I, Hoebeke P, et al. The standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function in children and adolescents: update report from the standardization committee of the International Children's Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn. Apr 2016;35(4):471-481. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  11. dos Santos J, Varghese A, Williams K, Koyle MA. Recommendations for the management of bladder bowel dysfunction in children. Pediat Therapeut. 2014;04:191. [CrossRef]
  12. Santos J, Lopes RI, Koyle MA. Bladder and bowel dysfunction in children: an update on the diagnosis and treatment of a common, but underdiagnosed pediatric problem. Can Urol Assoc J. Feb 16, 2017;11(1-2Suppl1):S64-S72. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  13. Hellström AL, Hjälmås K, Jodal U. Rehabilitation of the dysfunctional bladder in children: method and 3-year followup. J Urol. Oct 1987;138(4):847-849. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  14. Nevéus T, von Gontard A, Hoebeke P, Hjälmås K, Bauer S, Bower W, et al. The standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function in children and adolescents: report from the standardisation committee of the International Children’s Continence Society. J Urol. Jul 2006;176(1):314-324. [CrossRef]
  15. Chang SJ, Van Laecke E, Bauer SB, von Gontard A, Bagli D, Bower WF, et al. Treatment of daytime urinary incontinence: a standardization document from the International Children's Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn. Jan 16, 2017;36(1):43-50. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  16. Nieuwhof-Leppink AJ, Hussong J, Chase J, Larsson J, Renson C, Hoebeke P, et al. Definitions, indications and practice of urotherapy in children and adolescents: - a standardization document of the International Children's Continence Society (ICCS). J Pediatr Urol. Apr 2021;17(2):172-181. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  17. van Gool JD, de Jong TP, Winkler-Seinstra P, Tamminen-Möbius T, Lax H, Hirche H, et al. Multi-center randomized controlled trial of cognitive treatment, placebo, oxybutynin, bladder training, and pelvic floor training in children with functional urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. Jun 15, 2014;33(5):482-487. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  18. Schäfer SK, Niemczyk J, von Gontard A, Pospeschill M, Becker N, Equit M. Standard urotherapy as first-line intervention for daytime incontinence: a meta-analysis. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. Aug 2018;27(8):949-964. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  19. Vijverberg MA, Stortelder E, de Kort LM, Kok ET, de Jong TP. Long-term follow-up of incontinence and urge complaints after intensive urotherapy in childhood (75 patients followed up for 16.2-21.8 years). Urology. Dec 2011;78(6):1391-1396. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  20. Nevéus T, Fonseca E, Franco I, Kawauchi A, Kovacevic L, Nieuwhof-Leppink A, et al. Management and treatment of nocturnal enuresis-an updated standardization document from the International Children's Continence Society. J Pediatr Urol. Feb 2020;16(1):10-19. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  21. Glazener CM, Evans JH, Peto RE. Alarm interventions for nocturnal enuresis in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(2):CD002911. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  22. Nock MK, Photos V. Parent motivation to participate in treatment: assessment and prediction of subsequent participation. J Child Fam Stud. May 3, 2006;15(3):333-346. [CrossRef]
  23. Mulders MM, Cobussen-Boekhorst H, de Gier RP, Feitz WF, Kortmann BB. Urotherapy in children: quantitative measurements of daytime urinary incontinence before and after treatment according to the new definitions of the International Children's Continence Society. J Pediatr Urol. Apr 2011;7(2):213-218. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  24. Hyuga T, Nakamura S, Kawai S, Nakai H. Evaluation of the effectiveness of a short-term treatment and repeat treatment of nocturnal enuresis using an enuresis alarm. Urology. Jul 2017;105:153-156. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  25. Oğuz U, Sarıkaya S, Özyuvalı E, Şenocak Ç, Halis F, Çiftci M, et al. Family compliance with the use of alarm devices in the treatment of monosymptomatic nocturnal enuresis. Turk J Urol. Mar 24, 2014;40(1):52-55. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  26. Baker S, Richards D, Caldwell P. Relational agents to promote eHealth advice adherence. In: Proceedings of the 13th Pacific Rim International Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2014. Presented at: PRICAI 2014; December 1-5, 2014; Gold Coast, Australia. [CrossRef]
  27. Barbosa CD, Balp MM, Kulich K, Germain N, Rofail D. A literature review to explore the link between treatment satisfaction and adherence, compliance, and persistence. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2012;6:39-48. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  28. Stone AA, Shiffman S, Schwartz JE, Broderick JE, Hufford MR. Patient compliance with paper and electronic diaries. Control Clin Trials. Apr 2003;24(2):182-199. [CrossRef]
  29. Tincello DG, Williams KS, Joshi M, Assassa RP, Abrams KR. Urinary diaries: a comparison of data collected for three days versus seven days. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109(2 Part 1):277-280. [CrossRef]
  30. Mangera A, Marzo A, Heron N, Fernando D, Hameed K, Soliman AH, et al. Development of two electronic bladder diaries: a patient and healthcare professionals pilot study. Neurourol Urodyn. Sep 02, 2014;33(7):1101-1109. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  31. Apos E, Schuster S, Reece J, Whitaker S, Murphy K, Golder J, et al. Enuresis management in children: retrospective clinical audit of 2861 cases treated with practitioner-assisted bell-and-pad alarm. J Pediatr. Feb 2018;193:211-216. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  32. Joiner R, Gavin J, Brosnan M, Cromby J, Gregory H, Guiller J, et al. Comparing first and second generation digital natives' internet use, internet anxiety, and internet identification. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. Jul 2013;16(7):549-552. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  33. Palermo TM, Valenzuela D, Stork PP. A randomized trial of electronic versus paper pain diaries in children: impact on compliance, accuracy, and acceptability. Pain. Feb 2004;107(3):213-219. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  34. Kollins SH, DeLoss DJ, Cañadas E, Lutz J, Findling RL, Keefe RS, et al. A novel digital intervention for actively reducing severity of paediatric ADHD (STARS-ADHD): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Digit Health. Apr 2020;2(4):e168-e178. [CrossRef]
  35. Heerman WJ, Rothman RL, Sanders LM, Schildcrout JS, Flower KB, Delamater AM, Greenlight Investigators, et al. A digital health behavior intervention to prevent childhood obesity: the greenlight plus randomized clinical trial. JAMA. Dec 24, 2024;332(24):2068-2080. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  36. Ramsey RR, Plevinsky JM, Kollin SR, Gibler RC, Guilbert TW, Hommel KA. Systematic review of digital interventions for pediatric asthma management. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. Apr 2020;8(4):1284-1293. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  37. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O'Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. Oct 02, 2018;169(7):467-473. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  38. Niksch AL. mHealth in pediatrics-finding healthcare solutions for the next generation. Mhealth. 2015;1:7. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  39. Wang Y, Xue H, Huang Y, Huang L, Zhang D. A systematic review of application and effectiveness of mHealth interventions for obesity and diabetes treatment and self-management. Adv Nutr. May 15, 2017;8(3):449-462. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  40. Johnson EK, Estrada CR, Johnson KL, Nguyen HT, Rosoklija I, Nelson CP. Evaluation of a mobile voiding diary for pediatric patients with voiding dysfunction: a prospective comparative study. J Urol. Sep 2014;192(3):908-913. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  41. Myint M, Adam A, Herath S, Smith G. Mobile phone applications in management of enuresis: the good, the bad, and the unreliable! J Pediatr Urol. Apr 2016;12(2):112.e1-112.e6. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  42. Whale K, Beasant L, Wright AJ, Yardley L, Wallace LM, Moody L, et al. A smartphone app for supporting the self-management of daytime urinary incontinence in adolescents: development and formative evaluation study of URApp. JMIR Pediatr Parent. Nov 15, 2021;4(4):e26212. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  43. Bonnert M, Olén O, Lalouni M, Benninga MA, Bottai M, Engelbrektsson J, et al. Internet-delivered cognitive behavior therapy for adolescents with irritable bowel syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Gastroenterol. Jan 2017;112(1):152-162. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  44. Choi EK, Jung E, Bae E, Ji Y, Lee A. Two-step integrative education program and mHealth for Korean children with spina bifida: a quasi-experimental pre-post study. J Pediatr Nurs. Mar 2020;51:e92-e99. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  45. Choi EK, Jung E, Ji Y, Bae E. A 2-step integrative education program and mHealth for self-management in Korean children with spina bifida: feasibility study. J Pediatr Nurs. Nov 2019;49:e54-e62. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  46. Fine AM, Kalish LA, Forbes P, Goldmann D, Mandl KD, Porter SC. Parent-driven technology for decision support in pediatric emergency care. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. Jun 2009;35(6):307-315. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  47. McKenna PH, Herndon CD, Connery S, Ferrer FA. Pelvic floor muscle retraining for pediatric voiding dysfunction using interactive computer games. J Urol. Sep 1999;162(3 Part 2):1056-1062. [CrossRef]
  48. Herndon CD, DeCambre M, McKenna PH. Changing concepts concerning the management of vesicoureteral reflux. J Urol. Oct 2001;166(4):1439-1443. [Medline]
  49. Kaye JD, Palmer LS. Animated biofeedback yields more rapid results than nonanimated biofeedback in the treatment of dysfunctional voiding in girls. J Urol. Jul 2008;180(1):300-305. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  50. Kajbafzadeh AM, Sharifi-Rad L, Ghahestani SM, Ahmadi H, Kajbafzadeh M, Mahboubi AH. Animated biofeedback: an ideal treatment for children with dysfunctional elimination syndrome. J Urol. Dec 2011;186(6):2379-2384. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  51. Ladi-Seyedian S, Kajbafzadeh AM, Sharifi-Rad L, Shadgan B, Fan E. Management of non-neuropathic underactive bladder in children with voiding dysfunction by animated biofeedback: a randomized clinical trial. Urology. Jan 2015;85(1):205-210. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  52. Oktar T, Dönmez M, Özkuvancı Ü, Ander H, Ziylan O. Animated versus non-animated biofeedback therapy for dysfunctional voiding treatment: does it change the outcome? J Pediatr Surg. Apr 2018;53(4):825-827. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  53. Nieuwhof-Leppink AJ, de Jong TP, van de Putte EM, Schappin R. Does a serious game increase intrinsic motivation in children receiving urotherapy? J Pediatr Urol. Feb 2019;15(1):36.e1-36.e7. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  54. Halliday S, Meadow SR, Berg I. Successful management of daytime enuresis using alarm procedures: a randomly controlled trial. Arch Dis Child. Feb 01, 1987;62(2):132-137. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  55. Hagstroem S, Rittig N, Kamperis K, Mikkelsen MM, Rittig S, Djurhuus JC. Treatment outcome of day-time urinary incontinence in children. Scand J Urol Nephrol. Jul 09, 2008;42(6):528-533. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  56. Hagstroem S, Rittig S, Kamperis K, Djurhuus JC. Timer watch assisted urotherapy in children: a randomized controlled trial. J Urol. Oct 2010;184(4):1482-1488. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  57. Bartos NS, Hamilton S, Barnes E, Caldwell PH. Toilet training children with special needs using a Potty Monkey toy device. J Paediatr Child Health. Mar 19, 2021;57(3):365-370. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  58. Jennings M, Guilfoyle A, Green J, Cleary Y, Gowran RJ. Octopus watch fosters family resilience by enhancing occupational engagement for children with spina bifida and/or hydrocephalus: pilot study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. Nov 10, 2020;17(22):8316. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  59. Flannery MA, Butterbaugh GJ, Rice DA, Rice JC. Reminding technology for prospective memory disability: a case study. Pediatr Rehabil. Aug 05, 1997;1(4):239-244. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  60. Braga LH, Rickard M, Farrokhyar F, Jegatheeswaran K, Brownrigg N, Li C, et al. Bladder training video versus standard urotherapy for bladder and bowel dysfunction: a noninferiority randomized, controlled trial. J Urol. Mar 2017;197(3 Pt 2):877-884. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  61. Brownrigg N, Braga LH, Rickard M, Farrokhyar F, Easterbrook B, Dekirmendjian A, et al. The impact of a bladder training video versus standard urotherapy on quality of life of children with bladder and bowel dysfunction: a randomized controlled trial. J Pediatr Urol. Aug 2017;13(4):374.e1-374.e8. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  62. Toprak T, Tokat E. A quality analysis of nocturnal enuresis videos on YouTube. J Pediatr Urol. Aug 2021;17(4):449.e1-449.e6. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  63. Nishizaki N, Hirano D, Oishi K, Shimizu T. YouTube videos in Japanese as a source of information on nocturnal enuresis: a content-quality and reliability analysis. Pediatr Int. Jan 05, 2022;64(1):e15049. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  64. Batuman A, Gulec E, Turktan M, Gunes Y, Ozcengiz D. Preoperative informational video reduces preoperative anxiety and postoperative negative behavioral changes in children. Minerva Anestesiol. May 2016;82(5):534-542. [Medline]
  65. Bower WF, Moore KH, Adams RD. A novel clinical evaluation of childhood incontinence and urinary urgency. J Urol. Dec 2001;166(6):2411-2415. [CrossRef]
  66. Rhodes C, Timmons S. A feasibility study of an educational intervention for children with daytime wetting. Paediatr Nurs. Jun 2008;20(5):38-42. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  67. Evans JH, Collier J, Crook I, Garrud P, Harris P, MacKinlay DR, et al. Using multimedia for patient information--a program about nocturnal enuresis. Br J Urol. May 04, 1998;81 Suppl 3(s3):120-122. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  68. Redsell SA, Collier J, Garrud P, Evans JHC, Cawood C. Multimedia versus written information for nocturnal enuresis education: a cluster randomized controlled trial. Child Care Health Dev. Mar 11, 2003;29(2):121-129. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  69. Teo S, Cheek JA, Craig S. Improving clean-catch contamination rates: a prospective interventional cohort study. Emerg Med Australas. Dec 24, 2016;28(6):698-703. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  70. Jacob R, John-Denny B, Donaldson K, White B, Outhred A, McCaskill ME. Educational intervention does not reduce non-invasive urine contamination rates in children presenting to the emergency department. J Paediatr Child Health. Jan 19, 2020;56(1):142-147. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  71. Kaur T, Dahiya S, Satija SH, Nawal SJ, Kshetrimayum N, Ningthoujam J, et al. Foldscope as a primary diagnostic tool for oral and urinary tract infections and its effectiveness in oral health education. J Microsc. Jul 2020;279(1):39-51. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  72. Kuo AC, Geleris B, Arnhym A. TeleBBD: telehealth management of bladder bowel dysfunction - a provider survey of benefits and limitations. J Pediatr Urol. Dec 2021;17(6):792.e1-792.e7. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  73. Carter B, Whittaker K, Sanders C. Evaluating a telehealth intervention for urinalysis monitoring in children with neurogenic bladder. J Child Health Care. Mar 27, 2019;23(1):45-62. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  74. Baker S, Richards D, Caldwell P. Putting a new intelligent virtual face on a medical treatment advice system to improve adherence. In: Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Interactive Entertainment. 2014. Presented at: IE2014; December 2-3, 2014; Newcastle, Australia. [CrossRef]
  75. Richards D, Caldwell P. Building a working alliance with a knowledge based system through an embodied conversational agent. In: Proceedings of the 14th Pacific Rim Knowledge Acquisition Workshop. 2016. Presented at: PKAW 2016; August 22-23, 2016; Phuket, Thailand. [CrossRef]
  76. Richards D, Caldwell P. Improving health outcomes sooner rather than later via an interactive website and virtual specialist. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. Sep 2018;22(5):1699-1706. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  77. Klijn AJ, Uiterwaal CS, Vijverberg MA, Winkler PL, Dik P, de Jong TP. Home uroflowmetry biofeedback in behavioral training for dysfunctional voiding in school-age children: a randomized controlled study. J Urol. Jun 2006;175(6):2263-2268. [CrossRef]
  78. Urbonavičius BG, Kaškonas P. Urodynamic measurement techniques: a review. Measurement. Aug 2016;90:64-73. [CrossRef]
  79. Tokar B, Baskaya M, Celik O, Cemrek F, Acikgoz A. Application of machine learning techniques for enuresis prediction in children. Eur J Pediatr Surg. Oct 20, 2021;31(5):414-419. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  80. Macnab AJ, Shadgan B, Stothers L. The evolution of wireless near infrared spectroscopy applications in urology and rationale for clinical use. J Near Infrared Spectrosc. Jan 01, 2012;20(1):57-73. [CrossRef]
  81. Lee DG, Gerber J, Bhatia V, Janzen N, Austin PF, Koh CJ, et al. A prospective comparative study of mobile acoustic uroflowmetry and conventional uroflowmetry. Int Neurourol J. Dec 2021;25(4):355-363. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  82. Schulman SL, Von Zuben FC, Plachter N, Kodman-Jones C. Biofeedback methodology: does it matter how we teach children how to relax the pelvic floor during voiding? J Urol. Dec 2001;166(6):2423-2426. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  83. Sugar EC, Firlit CF. Urodynamic biofeedback: a new therapeutic approach for childhood incontinence/infection (vesical voluntary sphincter dyssynergia). J Urol. Dec 1982;128(6):1253-1258. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  84. Ferroni MC, Chaudhry R, Shen B, Chermansky CJ, Cannon GM, Schneck FX, et al. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation of the foot: results of a novel at-home, noninvasive treatment for nocturnal enuresis in children. Urology. Mar 2017;101:80-84. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  85. Manson G. A low cost portable enuresis alarm. J Med Eng Technol. Jul 09, 1979;3(4):171. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  86. Parkova I, Valisevskis A, Uzans A, Vilumsone A. Analysis and improvement of nocturnal enuresis alarm system. Industria Textila. 2013;64(6):355-361. [FREE Full text]
  87. Fordham KE, Meadow SR. Controlled trial of standard pad and bell alarm against mini alarm for nocturnal enuresis. Arch Dis Child. May 01, 1989;64(5):651-656. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  88. Peck B, Peck B, Harvey J, Green A, Svedas K, Whitaker S, et al. Body-worn versus bell-and-pad alarm device for the management of monosymptomatic nocturnal enuresis in children: a randomized controlled trial. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2020;47(5):507-512. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  89. Mruzek DW, McAleavey S, Loring WA, Butter E, Smith T, McDonnell E, et al. A pilot investigation of an iOS-based app for toilet training children with autism spectrum disorder. Autism. Feb 07, 2019;23(2):359-370. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  90. Caldwell PH, Sureshkumar P, Kerr MI, Hamilton S, Teixeira-Pinto A, Macaskill P, et al. A randomised controlled trial of a code-word enuresis alarm. Arch Dis Child. Apr 08, 2016;101(4):326-331. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  91. Barroso UJ, Lordêlo P, Teles A, Silveira DM, Renson C, Hoebeke P. New device and new concept for treating nocturnal enuresis: preliminary results of a phase one study. J Pediatr Urol. Dec 2014;10(6):1273-1276. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  92. Elinder G, Soback S. Effect of Uristop on primary nocturnal enuresis. A prospective randomized double-blind study. Acta Paediatr Scand. Jul 21, 1985;74(4):574-578. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  93. Petrican P, Sawan M. Design of a miniaturized ultrasonic bladder volume monitor and subsequent preliminary evaluation on 41 enuretic patients. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng. Mar 1998;6(1):66-74. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  94. Pretlow RA. Treatment of nocturnal enuresis with an ultrasound bladder volume controlled alarm device. J Urol. Sep 1999;162(3 Part 2):1224-1228. [CrossRef]
  95. Beauchamp-Parent P, Sawan M. New reconfigurable ultrasonic enuresis monitoring system. In: Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. 1998. Presented at: IEMBS 1998; November 1, 1998; Hong Kong, China. [CrossRef]
  96. Kristiansen NK, Djurhuus JC, Nygaard H. Design and evaluation of an ultrasound-based bladder volume monitor. Med Biol Eng Comput. Nov 2004;42(6):762-769. [CrossRef]
  97. Padmapriya B, Kesavamurthy T. Implementation of signal processing techniques to measure the urinary bladder volume. J Med Imaging Health Inform. Feb 01, 2015;5(1):79-83. [CrossRef]
  98. Kuru K, Ansell D, Jones M, De Goede C, Leather P. Feasibility study of intelligent autonomous determination of the bladder voiding need to treat bedwetting using ultrasound and smartphone ML techniques: intelligent autonomous treatment of bedwetting. Med Biol Eng Comput. May 26, 2019;57(5):1079-1097. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  99. Caswell N, Kuru K, Ansell D, Jones MJ, Watkinson BJ, Leather P, et al. Patient engagement in medical device design: refining the essential attributes of a wearable, pre-void, ultrasound alarm for nocturnal enuresis. Pharmaceut Med. Feb 23, 2020;34(1):39-48. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  100. Kuru K, Ansell D, Jones M, Watkinson BJ, Caswell N, Leather P, et al. Intelligent autonomous treatment of bedwetting using non-invasive wearable advanced mechatronics systems and MEMS sensors: intelligent autonomous bladder monitoring to treat NE. Med Biol Eng Comput. May 24, 2020;58(5):943-965. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  101. van Leuteren PJ, Nieuwhof-Leppink AJ, Dik P. SENS-U: clinical evaluation of a full-bladder notification - a pilot study. J Pediatr Urol. Aug 2019;15(4):381.e1-381.e5. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  102. van Leuteren PG, Klijn AJ, de Jong TP, Dik P. SENS-U: validation of a wearable ultrasonic bladder monitor in children during urodynamic studies. J Pediatr Urol. Dec 2018;14(6):569.e1-569.e6. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  103. Kwinten WM, van Leuteren PG, van Duren-van Iersel M, Dik P, Jira PE. SENS-U: continuous home monitoring of natural nocturnal bladder filling in children with nocturnal enuresis - a feasibility study. J Pediatr Urol. Apr 2020;16(2):196.e1-196.e6. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  104. van Leuteren PG, de Vries BA, de Joode-Smink GC, ten Haken B, de Jong TP, Dik P. URIKA, continuous ultrasound monitoring for the detection of a full bladder in children with dysfunctional voiding: a feasibility study. Biomed Phys Eng Express. Feb 06, 2017;3(1):017005. [CrossRef]
  105. Moon J, Lee S, Lee T, Kye S, Lee YS, Shin SC. A prospective study of examining physiological signals for estimating occurrence of nocturnal enuresis. In: Proceedings of the 39th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. 2017. Presented at: EMBC 2017; July 11-15, 2017; Jeju, Korea. [CrossRef]
  106. Erhel S, Jamet E. Digital game-based learning: impact of instructions and feedback on motivation and learning effectiveness. Comput Educ. Sep 2013;67:156-167. [CrossRef]
  107. Boendermaker WJ, Prins PJ, Wiers RW. Cognitive bias modification for adolescents with substance use problems--can serious games help? J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. Dec 2015;49(Pt A):13-20. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  108. Berg I, Fielding D, Meadow R. Psychiatric disturbance, urgency, and bacteriuria in children with day and night wetting. Arch Dis Child. Aug 01, 1977;52(8):651-657. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  109. Vasbinder EC, Goossens LM, Rutten-van Mölken MP, de Winter BC, van Dijk L, Vulto AG, et al. e-Monitoring of Asthma Therapy to Improve Compliance in children (e-MATIC): a randomised controlled trial. Eur Respir J. Sep 26, 2016;48(3):758-767. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  110. Martin DJ, Garske JP, Davis MK. Relation of the therapeutic alliance with outcome and other variables: a meta-analytic review. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2000;68(3):438-450. [CrossRef]
  111. Monkaresi H, Calvo RA, Pardo A, Chow K, Mullan B, Lam M, et al. Intelligent diabetes lifestyle coach. In: Proceedings of the 25th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference: Augmentation, Application, Innovation, Collaboration. 2013. Presented at: OzCHI '13; November 25-29, 2013; Adelaide, Australia.
  112. Yang SS, Wang CC, Chen YT. Home uroflowmetry for the evaluation of boys with urinary incontinence. J Urol. Apr 2003;169(4):1505-1507. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  113. Nitti VW. Pressure flow urodynamic studies: the gold standard for diagnosing bladder outlet obstruction. Rev Urol. 2005;7 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):S14-S21. [FREE Full text] [Medline]
  114. Walker RM, Di Pasquale B, Hubregtse M, St Clair Carter S. Pressure-flow studies in the diagnosis of bladder outlet obstruction: a study comparing suprapubic and transurethral techniques. Br J Urol. May 29, 1997;79(5):693-697. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  115. Awad A, Trenfield SJ, Pollard TD, Ong JJ, Elbadawi M, McCoubrey LE, et al. Connected healthcare: improving patient care using digital health technologies. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. Nov 2021;178:113958. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  116. Li J, Carayon P. Health care 4.0: a vision for smart and connected health care. IISE Trans Healthc Syst Eng. Feb 15, 2021;11(3):171-180. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  117. Gunasekeran DV, Tham YC, Ting DS, Tan GS, Wong TY. Digital health during COVID-19: lessons from operationalising new models of care in ophthalmology. Lancet Digit Health. Feb 2021;3(2):e124-e134. [CrossRef]
  118. Hassanalieragh M, Page A, Soyata T, Sharma G, Aktas M, Mateos G. Health monitoring and management using internet-of-things (IoT) sensing with cloud-based processing: opportunities and challenges. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Services Computing. 2015. Presented at: SCC 2015; June 27-July 2, 2015; New York, NY. [CrossRef]
  119. Fellah Arbi K, Soulimane O, Saffih F. IoT technologies combining glucose control with physiological signal: comparative study. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Electrical Engineering. 2020. Presented at: ICEE 2020; September 25-27, 2020; Istanbul, Turkey. [CrossRef]
  120. Abdul Minaam DS, Abd-ELfattah M. Smart drugs: improving healthcare using smart pill box for medicine reminder and monitoring system. Future Comput Inform J. Dec 2018;3(2):443-456. [CrossRef]
  121. Kumar SB, Goh WW, Balakrishnan S. Smart medicine reminder device for the elderly. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication & Automation. 2018. Presented at: ICACCA 2018; October 26-28, 2018; Subang Jaya, Malaysia. [CrossRef]
  122. Bladt L, Kashtiara A, Platteau W, De Wachter S, De Win G. First-year experience of managing urology patients with home uroflowmetry: descriptive retrospective analysis. JMIR Form Res. Oct 17, 2023;7:e51019. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  123. Bladt L, Blomme RF, Nieuwhof-Leppink AJ, Vermandel A, De Win G, Van Campenhout L. Design of a healthcare ecosystem to improve user experience in pediatric urotherapy. Proc Des Soc. May 16, 2024;4:1567-1576. [CrossRef]
  124. Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (Text with EEA relevance). European Union. 2016. URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj/eng [accessed 2025-01-03]
  125. Stiglic N, Viner RM. Effects of screentime on the health and well-being of children and adolescents: a systematic review of reviews. BMJ Open. Jan 03, 2019;9(1):e023191. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  126. Mendelsohn AL, Brockmeyer CA, Dreyer BP, Fierman AH, Berkule-Silberman SB, Tomopoulos S. Do verbal interactions with infants during electronic media exposure mitigate adverse impacts on their language development as toddlers? Infant Child Dev. Nov 22, 2010;19(6):577-593. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  127. Christakis DA, Garrison MM, Herrenkohl T, Haggerty K, Rivara FP, Zhou C, et al. Modifying media content for preschool children: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics. Mar 2013;131(3):431-438. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  128. Gates M, Hartling L, Shulhan-Kilroy J, MacGregor T, Guitard S, Wingert A, et al. Digital technology distraction for acute pain in children: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics. Feb 2020;145(2):e20191139. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  129. Linebarger DL, Walker D. Infants’ and toddlers’ television viewing and language outcomes. Am Behav Sci. Jan 01, 2005;48(5):624-645. [CrossRef]
  130. Marsh J, Plowman L, Yamada-Rice D, Bishop JC, Lahmar J, Scott F, et al. Exploring play and creativity in pre-schoolers’ use of apps: report for the children’s media industry. Technology and Play. 2015. URL: https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/media/28761/download?attachment [accessed 2025-01-03]
  131. Vijakkhana N, Wilaisakditipakorn T, Ruedeekhajorn K, Pruksananonda C, Chonchaiya W. Evening media exposure reduces night-time sleep. Acta Paediatr. Mar 29, 2015;104(3):306-312. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  132. Salti R, Tarquini R, Stagi S, Perfetto F, Cornélissen G, Laffi G, et al. Age-dependent association of exposure to television screen with children's urinary melatonin excretion? Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2006;27(1-2):73-80. [Medline]
  133. Girela-Serrano BM, Spiers AD, Ruotong L, Gangadia S, Toledano MB, Di Simplicio M. Impact of mobile phones and wireless devices use on children and adolescents' mental health: a systematic review. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. Jun 16, 2024;33(6):1621-1651. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  134. Bladt L, Nieuwhof-Leppink A, Van den Broeck L, Raes T, Wille M, Van Dooren E, et al. The design of an engaging focus group discussion toolkit involving school-aged children following urotherapy. In: Connectivity and Creativity in Times of Conflict. Washington, DC. Academia Press; 2023. [CrossRef]


BBD: bladder and bowel dysfunction
DUI: daytime urinary incontinence
DV: dysfunctional voiding
EMG: electromyography
NE: nocturnal enuresis
OAB: overactive bladder
PRISMA-ScR: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews
RCT: randomized controlled trial
RPM: remote patient monitoring
UI: urinary incontinence
UTI: urinary tract infection


Edited by T de Azevedo Cardoso; submitted 16.09.24; peer-reviewed by E Gea-Izquierdo, K Cakici; comments to author 07.12.24; revised version received 05.03.25; accepted 09.04.25; published 05.05.25.

Copyright

©Lola Bladt, Jiri Vermeulen, Alexandra Vermandel, Gunter De Win, Lukas Van Campenhout. Originally published in the Interactive Journal of Medical Research (https://www.i-jmr.org/), 05.05.2025.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Interactive Journal of Medical Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.i-jmr.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.