Published on in Vol 5, No 4 (2016): Oct-Dec

Online Health Information Regarding Male Infertility: An Evaluation of Readability, Suitability, and Quality

Online Health Information Regarding Male Infertility: An Evaluation of Readability, Suitability, and Quality

Online Health Information Regarding Male Infertility: An Evaluation of Readability, Suitability, and Quality

Journals

  1. Yokota R, Okuhara T, Ueno H, Okada H, Furukawa E, Kiuchi T. Online Japanese-Language Information on Lifestyle Factors Associated With Reduced Fertility: Content Analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(8):e19777 View
  2. Cisu T, Mingin G, Baskin L. An evaluation of the readability, quality, and accuracy of online health information regarding the treatment of hypospadias. Journal of Pediatric Urology 2019;15(1):40.e1 View
  3. Dueppen A, Bellon-Harn M, Manchaiah V. Suitability of English Language Internet-Based Information for Voice Disorders. Journal of Voice 2020;34(6):962.e1 View
  4. Monton O, Lambert S, Belzile E, Mohr-Elzeki D. An evaluation of the suitability, readability, quality, and usefulness of online resources for family caregivers of patients with cancer. Patient Education and Counseling 2019;102(10):1892 View
  5. Lee M, Shin C, An K. Trustworthiness, Readability, and Suitability of Web-Based Information for Stroke Prevention and Self-Management for Korean Americans: Critical Evaluation. Interactive Journal of Medical Research 2018;7(2):e10440 View
  6. Sykes S, Wills J, Frings D, Church S, Wood K. Multidimensional eHealth Literacy for Infertility. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2020;17(3):966 View
  7. Meppelink C, van Weert J, Brosius A, Smit E. Dutch health websites and their ability to inform people with low health literacy. Patient Education and Counseling 2017;100(11):2012 View
  8. Shen S, Zelkowitz P, Rosberger Z. Cancer and fertility: optimizing communication between patients and healthcare providers. Current Opinion in Supportive & Palliative Care 2019;13(1):53 View
  9. Speller B, Micic S, Daly C, Pi L, Little T, Baxter N. Oncofertility Decision Support Resources for Women of Reproductive Age: Systematic Review. JMIR Cancer 2019;5(1):e12593 View
  10. Wang F, Wang Z, Sun W, Yang X, Bian Z, Shen L, Pan W, Liu P, Chen X, Fu L, Zhang F, Luo D. Evaluating the Quality of Health-Related WeChat Public Accounts: Cross-Sectional Study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2020;8(5):e14826 View
  11. Kedzior S, Bianco-Miotto T, Breen J, Diener K, Donnelley M, Dunning K, Penno M, Schjenken J, Sharkey D, Hodyl N, Fullston T, Gardiner M, Brown H, Rumbold A. It takes a community to conceive: an analysis of the scope, nature and accuracy of online sources of health information for couples trying to conceive. Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online 2019;9:48 View
  12. Aguirre P, Coelho M, Rios D, Machado M, Cruvinel A, Cruvinel T. Evaluating the Dental Caries-Related Information on Brazilian Websites: Qualitative Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2017;19(12):e415 View
  13. Rathod P, Ould Brahim L, Belzile E, Lambert S. An evaluation of the suitability, readability, and quality of online resources for the self-management of depression. Patient Education and Counseling 2019;102(5):952 View
  14. Brochu F, Robins S, Miner S, Grunberg P, Chan P, Lo K, Holzer H, Mahutte N, Ouhilal S, Tulandi T, Zelkowitz P. Searching the Internet for Infertility Information: A Survey of Patient Needs and Preferences. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(12):e15132 View
  15. Cartwright A, Karunaratne M, Barr-Walker J, Johns N, Upadhyay U. Identifying National Availability of Abortion Care and Distance From Major US Cities: Systematic Online Search. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2018;20(5):e186 View